TAMESIDE’S Labour group should stop selecting their ‘husbands, wives, brothers, sisters, mums and dads’ to stand for election if they want the town hall to be ‘more diverse’, a Tory opponent has claimed.
A row broke out at a meeting of the full council after a Conservative Stalybridge South councillor was critical of the numbers of couples and relatives that were represented at the town hall.
An assessment by the Local Democracy Reporting Service has found that there are four pairs of couples, three siblings and two child and parent duos serving on Tameside council.
These include brothers and sister Cllr Jim Fitzpatrick, Cllr Betty Affleck and Cllr Philip Fitzpatrick, who represent Hyde Godley and Hyde Newton wards respectively.
Cllr Jim Fitzpatrick is also one of the council’s couples with Stalybridge North Cllr Jan Jackson.

These also include St Peter’s ward Cllr David McNally, and Cllr Denise Ward who represents Denton North East.
Denton West Cllr Michael Smith is married to Audenshaw councillor Teresa Smith, while husband and wife duo Ann Holland and Barrie Holland both serve as Droylsden West councillors.
Cllr Stephen Homer was elected to represent Mossley in May 2018, joining his son Jack Homer on the council benches.
And Audenshaw Cllr Oliver Ryan also sits alongside his mother, Laura Boyle, who was voted into a seat in Droylsden East ward in 2018.

Cllr Liam Billington told the virtual meeting that if the council wanted to be more diverse, it should feature less political families.
“I wish you’d take a leaf out of your own book because if you wanted to increase diversity of your own group you’d stop selecting your husbands, wives, brothers, sisters, mums and dads,” he said.
“Even now a third of your group is related to each other and that’s only going to get even worse because Councillor Drennan has got his mother selected.”
Chair of council business Cllr Joe Kitchen then interjected: “Can you stop personalising it please and you must also remember that every individual whose entitled to stand can do, it doesn’t matter who they’re related to or whether you agree with it or not.”
There are currently 50 Labour councillors, with 14 either related or married to each other – 28pc of all the party’s elected representatives in the borough.
Cllr Ged Cooney, who chairs the democratic processes working group, added: “Everyone on this council stands here as an individual.

“It doesn’t matter whether you’re a brother, a sister, an auntie, an uncle, whatever, a doctor, a nurse, a brain surgeon or an IT consultant or whatever you are here as an individual.
“The public elects you as an individual and you don’t elect a Labour member or a Conservative member or a Lib Dem or a Green, you’re elected as an individual first, so it doesn’t matter whether you’re related or not.
“It’s not unusual – it may be in your party but it’s not in ours – that actually you find that the household has the same sort of politics. That’s the reality.
“Everyone in this meeting has a right to be here as an individual and they do a decent and a bloody good job.”
Cllr Bill Fairfoull added: “We actually need more diversity on this council and I’m very proud of what this Labour group has done to actually encourage diversity but we can always do more and we’ll strive to do that.”
The meeting was also told that the Conservative group would not be supporting the submission to the electoral review for Tameside being carried out by the Local Government Boundary Commission.
The council is proposing to keep the status quo with 19 wards and 57 councillors in the borough.

But the Tory group said they would be putting in their own submission proposing to reduce the number of councillors by a third.
“This means that there would be 43 councillors in total with the current population,” Cllr Billington added.
“We have proposed smaller single and two member wards which would better serve individual towns and neighbourhoods. The current ward boundaries are confusing.
“We’ve also asked that all out elections every four years are considered instead of electing in thirds. This would save the taxpayer over £500,000 over the course of a four year period.”
But Denton South Cllr George Newton said having less councillors would impact directly on residents.
“Fewer councillors would mean fewer ways for residents to raise grievances, fewer ways to report issues, fewer opportunities to be represented in this virtual chamber,” he said.
“It would be more difficult for residents in Tameside to be heard and represented.
“We need a greater diversity as councillor Billington has said, we need a greater diversity of representation.
“More women, more parents, more people of colour and more working members and more people that actually look like the people in Tameside.
“If we want that we have to have three members per ward.”
Cllr Ryan added that all members ‘give up time to make sure we can serve our residents’.
“Anyone that’s met a councillor and worked with a councillor in Tameside knows they’re extremely hard working people and most people in terms of earnings have earned more in their working lives than they now do as councillors,” he said.



You can only imagine the conversation in some of thier houses on how are we going screw more money out of the people of Tameside . The way I see it is that if there was to be less councillors they have to work a bit harder than they do there is only problem with that and that would be less people to share the brown envelopes with .Some people may say I’m jealous because I’m not on this particular gravy train I have only lived in Hyde for 14 years and what I see if these councillors disgusts me .
This council is run more like the Cillian Mafia.
I have though for many years that the number of related councillors is diabolical, if they want a vote to go a particular way this could be swayed away from council chambers, instead being discussed over dinner or in the bedroom.
As pointed out by Mr Jones in the previous comment if the number of councillors was to be reduced some of the family income would be lost therefore it is not in their interest and has nothing to do with how the borough is run.
Well done to Councillor Billington for
bringing this matter to light and the Corespondent for printing the same.
“Give time”….. councillors are PAID to serve their community. If there were less they’d just have to work a little harder. A councillor without any other committee role gets over £12,000 per annum more if they have other committee functions. The allowance rates are available on the council website but you have to dig a bit as it’s not easily found. It will surprise you just how much they get! So Cllr Ryan your not so giving of your time. Check what committees he’s on and what his income is from it and he doesn’t come off quite so benevolent!
T.M.B.C. cannot even keep the streets clean.
Stop paying them , then lets see how alturistic they would be.
If all town councillors walked away tomorrow, the world would not stop turning.
They are neither use nor ornament.
The highly paid civil servants/managers should be held accountable
to the public to do the job they are paid to do.
Because people vote on national issues in local elections Labour will always win and can do whatever they want.
Maybe it’s only family members that show any interest in how Tameside is run and it sounds abit like sour grapes so if conservative get in at any time they won’t have family and friends
@Therese #3
Not too much digging and not too hard to find.
I’m sure they’ll be more links than this but here’s a bit of interesting reading for starters.
Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council
Members’ Allowances Scheme
https://www.tameside.gov.uk/CouncillorsandDemocracy/DemocraticServices/Members-Allowance-Scheme
Members Allowances and Expenses
https://www.tameside.gov.uk/memberallowances/1920
Member Accommodation and Travel costs billed direct to Tameside council 2019/20
https://www.tameside.gov.uk/memberallowances/1920/direct/figures
Whilst Mr Billington is not everyones cup of tea. I absolutely agree that the nepotism involved in the selction and support of candidates is something that has gone unmentioned for years. As for the number of councillors for each ward, ever wondered why only a third of seats are ever contested in elections. Work it out, we do not need 3 councillors per ward never have never will. But whilst this money train continues for the Labour supported exec all we can do is expose the corrupt way this organisation is operated. Well done Mr Billington for highlighting something that is only spoke only about in the dark corners of the town hall.
Nepotism. Identify a relative, give them inside knowledge on ‘the system’, select a safe ward which will never change allegiance to the first past the post system… press go! Bob’s your uncle!
PR for local government!!
No need for 3 councillors per ward . Don’t be fooled most of these councillors have full time jobs not even in Tameside. Plus they get death in service and a pension too . We have a new council office I wonder how many councillors would turn up there day in day out NONE because the majority are at work . It stinks . Been in tameside 40 years and never needed and never will need a councillor they should hang heads in shame. GREEDY