Column: Jonathan Reynolds, MP for Stalybridge, Hyde, Mossley and Dukinfield, looks at addressing unemployment after Covid-19

LAST month I wrote about the initial unemployment figures during the Covid-19 crisis.

This month’s figures, relating to the first full month of lockdown, were never going to be good. But the news that 2.8 million people are now in receipt of Universal Credit (UC) or Jobseeker’s Allowance (JSA), on top of the millions furloughed, is definitive proof that unemployment will be one of the biggest problems of the pandemic.

In this constituency, we now have 4,590 people in receipt of UC and JSA, plus 11,200 jobs furloughed and 2,800 supported by the Self Employment Income Support Scheme.

In an economic crisis, unemployment rises sharply but on average takes seven years to return to trend.

The Government response must be urgent. They should call a budget immediately with just one focus – jobs, jobs and jobs. Everything must be done to keep people in employment so the figures do not get worse, including bringing forward investment projects scheduled for later years.

The furlough scheme should be tailored and end flexibly in sectors particularly hard hit, such as hospitality. Sectors that are the most labour intensive, such as social care and retrofitting homes, should the priorities for further Government spending.

As we did after the financial crisis in 2008, young people should be guaranteed a job if they are out of work for more than six months.

If we were to wait until autumn for a budget, any measures other than tax changes would not come into effect until next year. Some people would already have been out of work for six months.

We will also need to better support people who are out of work. The social security system we had going into the crisis was not fit for purpose. The Government themselves acknowledged this with immediate changes to Universal Credit.

I welcomed these but they need to go further. It is my hope this will be a moment for a fundamental look at how the social security works and a chance to replace it with something fundamentally more supportive, efficient and run in the interests of what works for people rather than the assumptions of Government ministers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *